Why this ad?
Skip navigation

no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Skip navigation
A new report by the consumer advocacy group CHOICE reveals just a few of the deceptive practices used to market cosmetics. A broad survey of products found that many corporations employ friendly images and ambiguous language to falsely suggest the product is cruelty-free. Companies tempted by the growing Chinese market (and the promise of profit) must submit samples for animal testing. As the report concludes: "just because they've put a bunny on it, doesn't make it 'cruelty free'."
Goal: 50,000 Progress: 29,796
Sponsored by: The Animal Rescue Site

Multinational corporations must contend with different and often conflicting sets of standards when it comes to dealing in foreign markets. In many cases, executives face a difficult decision: concede to local laws and regulations or stand by basic principles of animal welfare. When antiquated regulations demand animal testing, companies often capitulate rather than lose access to that market and, consequently, those profits.

As a result, millions of animals are exposed to a series of painful tests each year, often resulting in death. In this time of technology and innovation, there are several compelling alternatives to animal testing, such as 3-D human skin, computer models, and test tube cell tests.

Urge major cosmetic companies to adopt non-animal testing and pledge to buy only cruelty-free products!

Sign Here






To:
Dr. Herbert Fisk Johnson III, Chairman & CEO of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Mr. Robert A. McDonald, Chairman, President & CEO of Procter & Gamble
Mr. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson

As corporations with a global reach, you are preeminently positioned to affect positive change throughout the world. By choosing to continue using animal testing methods, however, you choose to perpetuate a cruel and unnecessary practice.

The reality is animal testing methods are obsolete. There are many different ways to conduct chemical tests that don’t harm living beings, like the use of 3D human skin or test tube cells. These modern alternatives are more reliable and less costly.

Put simply, there is no reason for you to continue to harm and kill innocent animals. Many corporations have adopted cruelty-free testing procedures and I urge you to do the same. Until you do, I will not buy any of your products.

Petition Signatures


Mar 6, 2015 Tamara Christie Please stop this insidious and barbaric practice.
Mar 6, 2015 Roland Göttert
Mar 6, 2015 Antje Göttert
Mar 6, 2015 (Name not displayed)
Mar 5, 2015 Olivia Ruddick
Mar 5, 2015 Rose jones
Mar 5, 2015 Jordan Parmenter
Mar 5, 2015 Maria Collec
Mar 5, 2015 Amanda Aguilar
Mar 4, 2015 Annemarie Krogholm
Mar 4, 2015 Marcia Ayala
Mar 3, 2015 paul owens
Mar 3, 2015 Rosemarie Signer
Mar 3, 2015 Leni Fox
Mar 2, 2015 Phil Neal
Mar 2, 2015 Jill Tarleton
Mar 2, 2015 dalila orellana
Mar 2, 2015 Amanda Billert Leave the poor innocent animals alone!!
Mar 1, 2015 (Name not displayed)
Mar 1, 2015 Carolyn Labus
Mar 1, 2015 Linda Brenner
Feb 28, 2015 kim maccentelli
Feb 28, 2015 Michael Ramirez
Feb 27, 2015 johnnie thompson
Feb 26, 2015 Catherine Tallman
Feb 26, 2015 alice ford
Feb 25, 2015 annie lapierre
Feb 25, 2015 Brandi McCauley
Feb 25, 2015 lisa Lucko-Powell
Feb 25, 2015 C Chassard
Feb 25, 2015 Andrew Stevens
Feb 25, 2015 Angelic Rubalcava
Feb 25, 2015 Ruby Todd
Feb 25, 2015 Nelleke Talen
Feb 25, 2015 J. Valentine
Feb 25, 2015 Mireille Helme
Feb 25, 2015 audrey olesh
Feb 24, 2015 Carrie A. Cervenka
Feb 24, 2015 Daniel Daly
Feb 23, 2015 carol hall
Feb 23, 2015 Yael Shimshin
Feb 22, 2015 Matthew Meek If humans are the only ones benefiting, then humans should be the ones sticking their necks out.
Feb 22, 2015 Graziela Machado
Feb 22, 2015 elda molla
Feb 22, 2015 Elizabeth Hyla
Feb 22, 2015 Labail Genevieve
Feb 22, 2015 Yvette Medina
Feb 21, 2015 Crystal Kimmel
Feb 21, 2015 Ligat monique
Feb 21, 2015 Andria Winterbottom

back to top

Why this ad? Why this ad? Felicity Kitty Car Charm
Share this page and help fund food & care: