Skip navigation

no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Skip navigation
Goal: 30,000 Progress: 17,718
Sponsored by: The Animal Rescue Site

Tethering is a fairly common practice that can become incredibly dangerous for both dogs and humans when done irresponsibly. Letting a dog out into a yard on a lead to go to the bathroom is not going to cause any sort of harm, but far too often tethering is used as a way to keep a dog. Dogs that spend the majority of their time tethered are even categorized as "resident dogs" as opposed to "family dogs" [1] because of the distinct temperamental differences due to being tethered away from people.

Part of the danger with tethering is how easy it is to ignore. Dogs kept primarily on tethers tend to be far more anti-social than dogs raised with families indoors, with positive interaction. Tethered dogs, due to their isolation, are at a greater risk of attack humans. Over 76% of fatal dog attacks between 2000-2009 involved tethered "resident dogs," with a large number of the victims being children simply approaching the dog [1]. The psychological harm done to a dog through tethering is insidious and difficult to see until it's too late.

It isn't just psychological dangers to worry about either. Tethered dogs are also at risk for neck injuries, sores, collars growing into their skin, as well as being targets for bugs and parasites that endanger the dog's health [2]. In areas of extreme temperatures, dogs left outside without water or shelter can die within a few hours of being left outside. Leaving a dog tethered on the sidewalk or in the backyard during the summer is just as dangerous as leaving a dog in a hot car, something most states have laws against.

States like Texas, California, and Connecticut have enacted laws that allow tethering, but only for a "reasonable" period of time [3]. For example, Texas law states that "a reasonable period is one that does not exceed three hours in a 24-hour period," and is "no longer than is necessary for the owner to complete a temporary task that requires the dog to be restrained." California's law reads similarly. Owners can tether, but for "no longer than is necessary for the person to complete a temporary task that requires the dog to be restrained for a reasonable period." Such simple guidelines allow for flexibility, but protects the animals that most need it.

By enacting a similar law, Pennsylvania would be saving the lives of potentially thousands of dogs, and protecting children and adults by reducing potential dangers. Sign now to tell Pennsylvania to enact tethering laws to protect animal and human lives alike!

Sign Here






Dear Secretary Redding,

Pennsylvania has been one of the most vital states since the countries inception, helping to lead the country countless times through history, and taking the initiative to drive innovation and ideas. Yet, when it comes to protecting the lives of animals, Pennsylvania has fallen drastically behind. Instead of acting as a leader, Pennsylvania is now acting as a warning to other states.

Animal abuse is a sickening act that compounds violence in families and communities. With the FBI increasing its scrutiny and record keeping in regard to animal abuse, states have begun enacting simple, effective laws in order to reduce the abuse, and to protect innocent people from animal attacks. One of the most effective changes for states has been putting tethering laws into place.

Dogs that spend the majority of their lives on tethers account for an astronomical number of animal attacks. 76% of the deaths from dog attacks between 2000-2009 were from dogs subjected to tethering as their primary way of life. Tethering keeps dogs isolated, unable to process interacting with humans, and puts them at a greater risk of disease. Even a few hours outside in the extreme heat or summer or cold of winter is enough to kill a dog. Allowing people to tether their dogs for any amount of time they want does nothing but harm the dog, and potentially other Pennsylvanians.

States like California, Texas, and Connecticut put restrictions on tethering, allowing it for a temporary, “reasonable” amount of time. Creating a similar law in Pennsylvania against tethering would go a long way in protecting Pennsylvania’s citizens, and would once again put Pennsylvania in the forefront as a national leader in protecting animals. Help save the lives of Pennsylvania’s family, furry and human alike!

Sincerely,

Petition Signatures


Jun 18, 2018 Vicki Peters
Jun 18, 2018 Alicia Vicencio
Jun 18, 2018 Clemente Galarce
Jun 18, 2018 Cafu Barbosa
Jun 18, 2018 Nahuel Galarce
Jun 18, 2018 Matilda Gatuso
Jun 18, 2018 Gastón Gatuso
Jun 18, 2018 Coca Pascuale
Jun 18, 2018 Pascual Pascuale
Jun 18, 2018 Homero Galarce
Jun 18, 2018 Francesca Borzacchiello
Jun 18, 2018 Luciano Soissa
Jun 18, 2018 Antonietta Borzacchiello
Jun 18, 2018 Jeremías Cuevas
Jun 18, 2018 Carol De Hart
Jun 18, 2018 Michelle Dingman
Jun 18, 2018 Diann Ricketts
Jun 18, 2018 jennie hoskins
Jun 18, 2018 Kathy Baer
Jun 18, 2018 Tamara Bacon
Jun 18, 2018 Aníta Einarsdóttir
Jun 17, 2018 Leslie Low
Jun 17, 2018 Jose Roberto Magdalena
Jun 17, 2018 Vivienne K
Jun 17, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Jun 17, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Jun 16, 2018 John Holman
Jun 15, 2018 Ton V
Jun 15, 2018 Bridget Hopper
Jun 15, 2018 D. Douglas WE are their ONLY Voice ... They deserve Love, Respect and HUMANE Kind Treatment ...
Jun 15, 2018 Julia Zevallos
Jun 14, 2018 Kathleen Bainey
Jun 14, 2018 Gina Nanarjain
Jun 14, 2018 Gabriela Lara
Jun 14, 2018 Susan Shiffman
Jun 14, 2018 Lisa Webster
Jun 14, 2018 Jill Mann
Jun 14, 2018 Anto van Niekerk
Jun 14, 2018 Jaco van Eck
Jun 14, 2018 Wilna van Niekerk
Jun 14, 2018 Antoinette van Niekerk
Jun 13, 2018 Cameron Burke
Jun 13, 2018 Linda Wheeldon
Jun 13, 2018 Joyce Brogger
Jun 13, 2018 Reni Milovska
Jun 13, 2018 Deanna Grunau
Jun 13, 2018 Mary Embry
Jun 13, 2018 kevin brunty
Jun 13, 2018 P Beattie
Jun 13, 2018 (Name not displayed)

back to top

Floral Paws Loungewear
Share this page and help fund food & care: